Kipling gets way too verbose for no reason in New rule about colorized photographs - Mod applicationsThe Jungle Book 2. 2.5 stars, rounding down to 2 because these just were not nearly the caliber that the First Jungle Book stories were. Mowgli - Miguel Rivera (Coco) Shanti - Princess Isabel (Elena of Avalor) Bagheera - Bollo the Leopard (The Bollo Caper) Baloo - Janja (w/ Cheezi and Chungu) (The Lion Guard) Ranjan - Tipo (The Emperor's New Groove) Shere Khan - Soto (Ice Age) Kaa - Severus the Python (The Big Trip) Flunkey Monkey. Davidchannel's movie-spoofs of Disney's 2003 Animated adventure sequel film The Jungle Book 2.

Standard Release Bonus Features: The Making of The Jungle Book 2. Kids & Family 2003 1 hr 12 min. When Mowgli's friend Shanti follows him, wicked tiger Shere Khan sees an opportunity for revenge. Now living in the man village, Mowgli is missing life in the jungle, and decides to return after a visit from Baloo the bear.

On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film received an approval rating of 19 based on 91 reviews, with an average rating of 4.4/10. If a post breaks one of our rules you will be informed about it.The Jungle Book 2 received generally negative reviews from critics. So it is perfectly normal for your post to not show up in the new listing. I Got You Beat.All posts will be reviewed by a human moderator first before they become visible to all subscribers.

Include the date of the photograph in the title. Titles should not include any political or cultural interpretation or observation. Please add commentary and supplementary information in the comments. Titles should not include commentary, opinion or information about the circumstances surrounding the person/event in the image. It has received mostly poor reviews from critics and viewers, who have given it an IMDb score of 5.4 and a MetaScore of 38. Include an accurate description of the photograph (event, location, war, year, etc) in the title.The Jungle Book 2 is a 2003 kids & family movie with a runtime of 1 hour and 12 minutes.

Please only submit historic photographs. Posters, illustrations, compositions and postcards are not permitted. Include the resolution in in the title.

This will be removed and can result in a ban. Personal attacks, abusive language, trolling or bigotry in any form is not allowed. Please consider submitting those images to /r/thewaywewere or /r/HumanPorn.Images submitted here must be of historical events, taken at least 20 years ago.Post Limit - Please limit your submissions to no more than two (2) per calendar day so as to give others a chance for their content to be seen as well!Colorized photographs need to be tagged with and link to the original photograph in the comments.Colorized photographs that take too many artistic liberties will be removed, this includes (but is not limited to) removing details or adding things like patterns on clothing that are not visible in the original.Images that have been resubmitted within the last three months will be removed.Make sure your image is hosted by an approved host.Regarding reposts: it is not a repost unless it was posted to /r/HistoryPorn within the last three months, or if it's already in the top 100 of all time.If you have any questions check out the FAQ. Pictures of family members are not allowed in r/HistoryPorn unless they were taken in the context of a verifiable, historically significant event.

When you compare him to say Shakespeare, while his body of work speaks for itself, he is from a time that pre-dates the Empire. HeвЂ™s considered among the greatest of English language writers for a reason.HeвЂ™s considered among the greatest of English language writers for a reason.For good reason too. Hinduism and itвЂ™s values affected him greatly, and he acknowledged that the Baghavad Gita inspired whatвЂ™s probably his most famous poem, If.Anyway, I urge people to ignore the peanut gallery of criticism that gets heaped on Kipling for that one poem and to explore his writing for themselves. He was so infatuated with India that he signed his name with a swastika for a period, albeit decades before the symbol was appropriated by the Nazis.

Speaking of infrastructure built reminds me of arguments made by Confederate apologists who say, вЂњslaves had food, clothing, shelter, and many of the masters were generous and kind.вЂќ Both the enslaved and Filipinos were ruled without their consent, but pointing out token niceties assuages guilt.Building schools and other infrastructure is nice, sure, but had Filipinos been allowed to create their own government, as Aguinaldo already had a democratic constitution prepared, and had they been allowed to rule themselves, who knows what sort of successes they could have had.The US never intended to keep the Philippines as a permanent colony, eventual independence was always the goal.I've never heard that, and I'm interested to know where you found it. The official orders from American generals was to вЂњkill anyone over age 10.вЂќThe US may have invested millions, but their occupation of the Philippines was immensely profitable for the access it gave to Chinese markets and the captive Filipino market for American goods as well as access to Filipino natural resources and labor. More Filipinos died in the conflict than both sides did during the American Civil War according to historian Daniel Immerwahr. Hundreds of thousands of Filipinos died in their war for independence against the US, in which the US implemented concentration camps, and routinely massacred civilians. History isn't 'clean', whitewashing it will do no one any good.It can teach people that this was how the world worked back then you know.The USвЂ™s colonial project in the Philippines was not predicated upon uplifting the Filipinos. Rather than neglect and forget your colonial past I believe it is doing a disservice to that era if its forgotten since the remnants of it are everywhere in the UK.

You think there's any chance the US is letting that guy stay in power?Considering the US assassinated the leader of or overthrew over a hundred governments in the 20th century, because the did something vaguely resembling socialism, I'd say the chances are slim to none.This is absolute nonsense, and some of the worst historical revisionism I have read in my life. That's the American formula for imperialism.Imagine for a second, if the Filipinos wanted to elect a socialist or a communist who was going to go down a different path of modernization. Control over everything else so it doesn't become a drain on us or a bad PR thing. Keep the ownership for Americans/Europeans, give the Filipinos/Cubans/etc. What really makes the investors money is ownership of everything. They realized that direct political control only got you into more trouble, suppressing rebellions and whatnot.

And acknowledging that racism being a common belief in society contributed to Kipling's use of racism in 'The White Man's Burden' is not somehow defending racism.